Skip to main content
All Posts By

Mark Hawksworth

Biofertilizers, Biostimulants & Biopesticides: Definitions, Differences & Challenges

By Biostimulants, FERTILIZER PRODUCTS No Comments

Stephanie Roberts, Agronomic R&D Manager for Omnia gave a very informative presentation on the significance and market potential of biostimulants, biofertilizers and biopesticides including a detailed explanation of the definitions, differences and challenges surrounding the use of these products; especially in relation to Group 3 fertilizer registration in South Africa. There is tremendous interest in this market commercially as worldwide growth of the global stimulants market is expected to reach US$ 3.2 billion within the next five years while the humanitarian challenge increases as agriculture will be expected to feed an extra 400 million mouths in the next five years. Bioproducts can help to sustainably improve crop yields by reducing crop stress and improving nutrient use efficiency. However this segment of the industry faces challenges of perception as many of these products have been described with dubious claims and a mysterious technical story leading to them being labelled as “muck and magic” in the United Kingdom and “snake oils” in the USA. Some reasons that these perceptions have arisen: Many products such as kelps and amino acids derived from fish emulsions originated from the organic farming industry which has been associated with not always using the best science available. Many of these products were developed from industry driven R&D and not from Universities, even in Universities there is mistrust relating to these products. Problems of fake products; for example where people are selling caramel colourants and labelling them as “humic”. Unfortunately the genuine products don’t always work and cannot be guaranteed to always give a proper response. A lesson from the “American Snake Oil” industry  The original snake oils were used by Chinese immigrants who built the transcontinental railroad in the USA in the 1880’s to ease muscle pain. The Americans realized the potential and used extracts from rattlesnakes when the original snake oil ran out as an alternative, soon unscrupulous businessmen were selling mineral oil as snake oil; which led to snake oil gaining the reputation as something not to be trusted. A hundred years later it was found that Chinese water snakes did indeed carry Omega 3 fatty acids which have anti-inflammatory properties. The lesson from the snake oil industry is that the problem was not related to product but rather to the fake product. As Roberts explained that the purpose of Group 3 registration is to ensure that biostimulants and biofertilizers aren’t registered as Remedies but as fertilizers and that biopesticides remain registered as Remedies. It is most important to ensure that only proven biostimulants and biofertilizers are marketed to farmers and for the industry to validate the products being sold so that the market is not destroyed by non-regulated non proven products. The definition of Biostimulants according to the current Group 3 regulations of Act 36: “A fertilizer containing natural or synthetic substance(s) or organism(s) or maintain(s) the growth or yield of plants or the physical, chemical or biological condition (fertility) of the soil; and “soil improver” shall have the same meaning“. The major challenge facing…

Read More
FERTASA BIO FERTS LOGO

THE BIOSTIMULANTS / BIOFERTILIZERS CONCEPT – A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

By Biostimulants, FERTILIZER PRODUCTS One Comment

Barabara Novak is an agronomic engineer and consultant who participated in the European Biostimulant Industry Council (EBIC) that interfaced with the European Commission (EC) with the aim to promote the development of suitable regulatory frameworks for biostimulants and specialty fertilizers. Novak presented a paper at the FERTASA Biofertilizer Workshop held in November 2017 on the European perspective of the development of the biostimulant / biofertilizer concept and definition and its implications for product placement in EU regulatory frameworks. The use of biological products in agriculture and crop chemistry has gained considerable attention in the last ten years, and is now no longer considered as a “fad” of “fly by night” product segment and has evolved into a structural component of the crop chemicals market. They are considered as one of the most attractive investment segments in the crop chemicals industry with forecasted double digit growth for the next ten years. Novak explained that the group of biological plant nutrition products that are referred to as biofertilizers in South Africa  are referred to as biostimulants, metabolic enhancers, phytostimulators, plant elicitors, biogenic stimulators amongst other terms in other countries. The term biofertilizers used in South Africa refers to a specific group of products that are termed as biostimulants in Europe –  biofertilizers are referred to as biostimulants for the remainder of this article. The wide range of terminology and definitions used to describe these products is considered as one of the key barriers for growth of this segment of the industry and has created confusion in the market with negative implications for market development such as a lack of market information and product registries which influences  industry validation which in turn is influences end-user acceptance and creates mistrust.  Novak stressed that possibly the most important outcome is that a science based and industry accepted definition is a prerequisite for the development of a regulatory framework that can distinguish these products from existing legislative product categories. The Development of the European Biostimulant Definition Currently these is no regulatory or legally-accepted definition of biostimulants anywhere in the world including the European Union (EU). Literature reviews indicate that the term was first used in 1997 in a web journal for turf professionals where biostimulants were defined as “materials that in minute quantities promote plant growth”. The use of the words “minute quantities” distinguish biostimulants from fertilizers which also promote plant growth but in much larger quantities. In 2007 the term was first defined in scientific literature as “materials other than fertilizers, that promote plant growth”. The addition of the phrase “other than fertilizer” is significant as an early attempt to explicitly distinguish this class of compounds from traditional fertilizer products. In subsequent years the term has been used to define an even wider range of compounds and has been used as a versatile descriptor of virtually any substance beneficial to plants without being a fertilizer, Plant Protection Product (PPP) or soil improver. Clearly there was a necessity clarify the status of biostimulant products not just…

Read More

BIOSTIMULANTS & BIOFERTILIZERS – GROUP 3 FERTILIZERS

By Biostimulants, FERTILIZER PRODUCTS No Comments

For centuries man used rudimentary techniques in his endeavors to fertilize the soil and make crops grow, however it was only after Justus von Liebig  established conclusively that “green plants can be nourished by mineral salts in solution and specified that there are three essential elements for plant growth Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K)” that the industrial production of chemical fertilizers developed onwards from the 1880’s. By 1888 the French had passed the first laws governing the use of fertilizers which required in particular that the manufacturer indicate the percentage of the nutrients (N, P and K) and their origin which remained in place until the late 1970’s when the rapid development of agriculture and emergence of new products especially fertilizer mixtures made it’s revision necessary. Today there are complex laws governing the manufacture of fertilizers and their use through-out the world. Agricultural research and development has proven extremely successful over the past century increasing crop production ensuring food security for an ever-growing world population through improved genetics, crop protection, the efficient use of fertilizers and advanced understanding of plant and soil chemistry and nutrition. Numerous other factors that influence and benefit plant growth have been identified and used advantageously as “biostimulants” and “biofertilizers”. The benefits of leguminous crops on the soil had been recognized for centuries however in was only in 1901 that biological nitrogen fixation was first discovered and in the 1950’s that research started to make headway. The symbiotic effects of fungi with plant roots was first studied in the 1880’s and the term mycorrhiza was introduced in 1885. The discovery of Plant Growth Substances began with Darwin’s discovery of Auxins in 1880 followed by Ethylene in 1917, Gibberellins in 1926, Cytokinins in the 1950’s and Abscisic acid in 1963. Seaweeds have historically also been used as fertilizers but use declined with the advent of chemical fertilizers. In the 1970’s the beneficial effects of the brown seaweed Ecklonia maxima (kelp) were identified and extraction methods of the cellular content developed; in 1983 the first doctoral thesis on the beneficial properties of its extracts was published. Over the past two decades there has been tremendous worldwide growth and development of the Biofertilizers, Biostimulants and Biopesticides market which is now a fast growing  and lucrative segment of the crop chemicals industry. By definition these products are classified as fertilizers and are subject to  world-wide regulation just like conventional fertilizers. The registration of these products and international law governing their use are however far more complex as in many cases involve the use of living organisms and metabolites which may have environmental implications; they are regulated by Act 36 of 1947 as Group 3 fertilizers and at least 8 other Acts of legislation in South Africa. In February 2016 the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) published their guidelines for the registration of Group 3 Fertilizers, these can be accessed on the following link: http://www.nda.agric.za/doaDev/sideMenu/ActNo36_1947/AIC/DAFF%20GROUP%203%20FERTILISER%20GUIDELINE%20Final%2011%20february%202016%20(2).pdf In November 2017 FERTASA hosted a Biofertilizer Workshop which was open to…

Read More

THE FUTURE OF FERTILIZER – FERTASA ANNUAL CONGRESS

By Conferences and Training No Comments

Book your place for the FERTASA 58th ANNUAL CONGRESS to held on 18 & 19 April 2018 at the Premier Hotel,  OR Tambo, Kempton Park, Gauteng. Some of the speakers include  Dr Shamie Zingore, Regional Director from the International Plant Nutrition Institute covering Nutrient Stewardship and Sustainable Fertilizer Use, Professor Nico Labuschagne covering Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers, Prof Anne Grobler covering Nanotechnology & Fertilizers and Dr John Purchase, covering Major Trends Driving the Future of Agriculture. Register and pay by 3 April to avoid the late registration fee. FERTASA CONGRESS 2018 FINAL PROGRAMME  

Read More

WELCOME TO AGRISPEX

By Uncategorized One Comment

Welcome to Agrispex; I’m delighted to officially launch Agrispex today as I begin my 30th year of service to the fertilizer industry. There is no doubt that climate change is a reality as is the fact that the world population will increase by 400 million people within the next five years, placing greater demands on agriculture to produce staple foods while at the same competing with urban populations and industry for limited water resources and arable land. Exciting advances in agricultural production including the integrated use of bio-fertilizers, bio-stimulants and bio-pesticides in fertilizer programs combined with new technologies continue to  enable commercial agriculture to successfully face the challenges of increasing  production costs and fluctuating returns determined by the supply and demand for safe food. South African soil erosion losses are estimated to be 300 million tons per year which combined with the losses of soil nutrients, soil organic matter, reduced soil water holding capacity  and increased soil acidification collectively threaten sustainability. The adoption of conservation agriculture practices are essential for long term maintenance of our soils, biodiversity and natural systems; especially our rivers, estuaries and marine ecosystems. The long term aim of Agrispex is to promote  soil productivity and the conservation of agri-ecosystems through the publication of scientifically based short articles that are easy to read, can be understood by the layman and serve as an on-line technical manual for students, farmers, agricultural advisors and marketers in the future. I trust that you find the current and future articles published useful and interesting and wish you successful visits to Agrispex in the future.  

Read More
Sources of lime commonly used in South Africa

LIME SOURCES COMMONLY USED IN SOUTH AFRICA

By LIME & LIMING PRODUCTS No Comments

Soil acidification is a natural phenomenon which unfortunately is accelerated by numerous agricultural practices including the application of nitrogen sources containing high rates of ammonium (NH4+) nitrogen . A regular soil sampling and liming program should be central to every fertilizer program to ensure that soil productivity is not limited due to unchecked increases in soil acidity. South Africa has an abundance of good quality agricultural lime sources which are geographically well distributed and ensure that a responsible lime program is affordable. Disclaimer: The figures published are not a guarantee of analysis, they are sourced from published Product Data Sheets and provided to serve as an indicator of typical analysis which may vary due to changes in minerology of the lime sources. Please note: Consult a qualified person (Act 36 of 1947) for specific applications / recommendations.

Read More

SOURCES OF GYPSUM IN SOUTH AFRICA

By LIME & LIMING PRODUCTS, Soil Acidity, Sulphur No Comments

Gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) and its dehydrated forms are relatively common minerals that are distributed worldwide in sedimentary and evaporative deposits and produced as bye products of various industrial processes. The main sources of gypsum are from the production of phosphoric acid from rock phosphate; gypsum produced from this process is a finely grained high purity material and is commonly referred to as phosphogypsum (PG). The main sources of PG in South Africa are located in Modderfontein, Phokeng, Potchefstroom and Phalaborwa which are reported to carry in excess of 15 million tons. Other sources of gypsum are produced from flue gas desulphurization (FGD) in industrial processes in which Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) is scrubbed to meet SO2 emission standards. There are numerous deposits of natural gypsum in the Cape which are mined. Natural gypsum tends to have a larger particle size distribution than gypsum produced from industrial processes unless it is milled finely. The effect of particle size is an important factor in determining the effectiveness of gypsum amendments. Gypsum is slightly soluble in aqueous solution, dissolving to an extent of 2.5 g / l. Natural gypsum may contain traces of calcium carbonate and therefore may reflect slightly alkaline pH levels on analysis, while PG may contain free acid which may reflect as slightly acidic on analysis. Overall Gypsum has very little effect on soil pH. South African agriculture utilizes approximately 200 000 tons of gypsum per year which with an approximate 18% Sulphur (S) content provides a cost effective source of S. Disclaimer: The figures published are not a guarantee of analysis, they are sourced from published Product Data Sheets and provided to serve as an indicator of typical analysis which may vary due to industrial impurities and changes in minerology of the natural sources. Please note: Consult a qualified person (Act 36 of 1947) for specific applications / recommendations

Read More

SULPHUR SOURCES

By Micro Nutrients, Sulphur Products No Comments

Sulphur (S) is one of the secondary macro nutrients that has often been forgotten or neglected in planning a fertilizer program. The general “rule of thumb” was that crops required the same amount of S as they do phosphorus. Prior to the advent of high grade phosphates which form the back bone of todays NPK bulk blends  the S requirement of crop was supplied through NPK  compound containing AMS, single super phosphate, enriched super phosphate and ammoniated super phosphates such as AMP(16), and atmospheric S from industrial SO2 emissions. Alternative sources of S are found in Potassium Sulphate, ASN and Ammonium Sulphate. The cheapest source of S is from gypsum. Disclaimer: The figures published are not a guarantee of analysis, they are sourced from published Product Data Sheets and provided to serve as an indicator of typical analysis which may vary due to production processes, impurities and changes in minerology of natural sources. Please note: Consult a qualified person (Act 36 of 1947) for specific applications / recommendations.

Read More
Potassium Nitrate

PROPERTIES OF POTASSIUM NITRATE

By Potassium Products No Comments

All figures quoted should be considered as a typical product analysis and may vary due to manufacturing process and raw materials. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES A granular crystal or fine crystalline white powder. Critical Relative Humidity @ 30ºC: 90.5. Solubility @ 20ºC: 47 g/100ml of water (31% concentration). Water quality is critical in determining solubility, in some areas advisors recommend  25g /100ml water (20% concentration) to ensure solubility. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Chemical formula: KNO3. 38% Potassium (K). 13% Nitrogen (N). Salt index: 74 (relative to Sodium Nitrate at 100). Acidification index: non acidifying AGRONOMIC BENEFITS Suitable for crops that are sensitive to chloride. Technical grade product should preferentially be used for foliar feeding and drip irrigation. Compatible for blending with MAP, LAN, Urea, Ammonium Sulphate ,Potassium Chloride. Please note: Consult a qualified person (Act 36 of 1947) for specific applications / recommendations.

Read More
Triple Super Phosphate - TSP also referred to as Double Super

PROPERTIES OF TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE – TSP

By FERTILIZER PRODUCTS, Phosphate products No Comments

All figures quoted should be considered as a typical product analysis and may vary due to manufacturing process and raw materials. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES A generally spherical shaped granular product. Colour generally light to dark grey. Critical Relative Humidity @ 30ºC: 75 – 85. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES A mono calcium phosphate. Chemical formula: Ca(H2PO4)2 . H2O. 19 – 23% Phosphorus (P). Over 90% of the P in TSP is water soluble. 15.5 – 17.1% Calcium (Ca). 1 – 2.3% Sulphur (S). Salt index: 10.1 (relative to Sodium Nitrate @ 100) AGRONOMIC BENEFITS TSP provides  the highest concentration of straight phosphate fertilizer that is available. Provides a P source for production of  blends for leguminous crops where no additional nitrogen is desired. Granules dissolve rapidly in the soil in the presence of adequate soil moisture. Compatible for blending with LAN, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Sulphate, Potassium Nitrate.   Please note: Consult a qualified person (Act 36 of 1947) for specific applications / recommendations.

Read More